Blog Archives

ORTWS comments on House Bill 3228

The change in policy ties directly into engaging non-consumptive users in ownership of the wildlife management agencies and clarifies ODFW’s role for staff, managers, elected officials and the public. Read ORTWS’ testimony in support of HB3228 here.

Recovering America’s Wildlife Act (H.R. 5650 would dedicate $1.3 billon to state conservation programs

Following the recent recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Sustaining America’s Diverse Fish and Wildlife Resources, Congressman Don Young (R-AL) and Congresswomen Debbie Dingell (D-MI) have introduced the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act (H.R. 5650) in the House of Representatives on July 6.

If passed, the legislation would dedicate $1.3 billion in federal funds annually to state conservation programs – a development holding significant promise for funding ODFW and the Oregon Conservation Strategy.


2015 Summer E-Raven Newsletter now available

Click on the following link 2015 Summer Newsletter to read the latest happenings with ORTWS

CANCELED: Legislative Action! Meet with Representative Dan Rayfield


This event has been canceled due to low RSVP. If you are interested in seeing this event happen, please contact Vee Blackstone at


Join ORTWS for the next in our Legislative Outreach series. We are hosting a Meet and Greet with State Representative Dan Rayfield on Saturday, February 21, 2015 from 10:15 – 11:15 AM at Natural Grocers in Corvallis.

Dan is the representative for House District 16, covering Corvallis. To see a map of his district, click here. To find out more about Rep. Rayfield, visit his website here!

WHEN: Saturday February 21 10:15 – 11:15 AM

WHERE: 1235 NW 10th Street Corvallis, OR 97330

Why is this important? Rep Rayfield is the House co-chair of the Natural Resources Subcommittee on Natural Resources. He and the Senate co-chair head up the committee that makes most of the budget decisions on natural resources issues, including wildlife management. The co-chairs of the full Ways and Means Committee make major decisions, such as how much money will go to natural resources budgets, and the subcommittee will then decide how that money is divided up.

So, letting Rep. Rayfield know that ORTWS is here to provide sound scientific information to help him with those decisions is a pretty big deal!

Meeting Agenda: Introductions around, Rep Rayfield will speak a bit, and ORTWS will inform Rep Rayfield about us and our membership, the Oregon Conservation Strategy, and our interests. Then we will have Q and A from the membership!

Please RSVP to Vee Blackstone at so that we can ensure a good, supportive turn out.  Our goal is to have at least 20 members there, and students are welcome and encouraged to attend!

Can’t make it but have a question? Sent it to Vee Blackstone and she will ask it for you!

Survey Results – Financials and Legislative Liaison

Dear ORTWS Members,

Big thanks to those of you who participated in our legislative liaison survey! The survey was sent to over300 members and 47 of you replied or roughly 15% of the membership. The first and second questions were the most decisive, asking if you thought a legislative liaison was of value to ORTWS and if you support the retention of a liaison. 89% of you valued the services, and there was overwhelming support in keeping a legislative liaison (80% in favor). As a result, the Board decided to renew the contract with Stephen Kafoury through 2015 with some revised reporting responsibilities and a budget contingency clause. To make up the 2015 budget shortfall, the Board will be sending a fundraising letter request to each of you soon.

Question 3 asked if you thought we should support the legislative liaison position at the current level, lower, or higher. 42 percent of respondents answered this question. Approximately 25% of you said to maintain the current level of funding, 9 percent said higher and 31 percent said lower. We are constrained by our budget and this year we were able to maintain similar service at a lower cost.

Question 4 addressed the current ORTWS budget and asked for suggestions for how our chapter can raise funds to support the legislative liaison position. 26 people answered this question. There were lots of great suggestions:

  • Several folks indicated they would be willing to pay higher membership dues. We will consider raising dues in the future. We raised membership dues from 10 to 15 dollars recently and feel that increasing dues again so soon isn’t in the best interest of the membership at this time.
  • Targeted fundraising for legislative position was also suggested. The board will be initiating a letter writing campaign specifically to help fund the legislative position. There is already a place to make donations to ORTWS on our website.
  • It was pointed out the administrative costs should be kept to a minimum. We agree! The 2014 spending report for the board has been posted to our website. From this report, you can see that administrative costs are less than 7 percent of total chapter expenses.
  • Funding for scholarships is through a special fund and though in the past scholarships have been paid out of the general fund, this is no longer the case.
  • Several folks recommended finding lower cost options for that annual meeting. We agree! We work hard to negotiate contracts for the annual meeting that keep food and lodging costs low for our members. Lodging is always within government‐allowable per diem rates. We utilize government per diem guidelines to develop our food budget which helps us determine what to charge for registration. Keeping costs down is definitely important!

Question 5 asked if there are subjects the membership feels we, as a chapter, should be preparing white papers or positions statements for. About half of the people who responded to the survey answered this question.

Of the folks that answered there were lots of good ideas put forth for white papers and/or position statements. It was pointed out that this should be separate from the legislative liaison position and potentially handled through the conservation affairs committee. It was pointed out that these should be science‐based. We agree! Our current board and committee members are already working very hard for the chapter and we encourage those of you with interest in preparing white papers and position statements to get involved! See links in this letter for folks to contact. Ideas included:

  • Bighorn sheep
  • Lead
  • Grazing
  • Birds
  • Klamath basin
  • Wildlife policy as it relates to wolves and cougars
  • Management of public lands
  • Forestry and wildlife
  • Urban wildlife connectivity and fragmentation
  • ESA/CWA and state legislation

We also asked if you would like to be on the legislative or conservation affairs committees, and only 18% answered with a “Yes”. To those that answered yes, thank you, we’d love to have you! Please contact Todd Mabee or Leslie Bliss‐Ketchum to get involved! The Board does all it can, but we need your help to accomplish long‐lasting positive change for wildlife in Oregon.

The last question asked for general feedback and we received some great comments, suggestions and questions and the Board wanted to take the opportunity to address some of these.

  • Several of you wanted to know more about what the legislative liaison provides for ORTWS, so we will have Stephen come speak to the membership at our 2015 meeting. This will be included in the Annual Meeting schedule and all members will be invited. Until then, recent reports are available on the ORTWS website.
  • Some inquired about the use of the mutual fund. This mutual fund was set up to fund scholarships and until now had only been allowed to grow. For the past several years the ORTWS had been funding scholarships out of the general fund instead using the mutual fund. This year, we will be funding scholarships with some of interest earned in 2014. In 2015 we will be able to offer a total of $3,000 in scholarships and will also be reinvesting $2,600 back into the mutual fund! A summary of 2014 and 2015 financials are available on the website.
  • Just to clarify, all Board positions are elected by the membership. This may be confusing because the ballots have you cast a vote for president‐elect and vice president‐elect. This is because these positions are two‐year term with first year being the president‐elect or vice‐president elect and the second year these positions move into president and the vice‐president positions, respectively. The only time positions, except President, are appointed by the Board is if they are vacated prior to their term being completed. Our elections follow our bylaws which are available on the website here.
  • Some of you commented on the website. After much trial and tribulation, the Board has finally found a website that is reliable, functional, and user‐friendly. This is a work in progress so your comments are appreciated. We have added the mission statement to the home page, and it is also on our about us page. Also we have been adding policy letters and other documents as we find them. If you have specific documents that should be on the website please email
  • We have been working hard on improving our membership outreach. A big part of this effort is to become more organized and efficient so we can focus on other parts of the chapter, like workshops. In the past two years, we developed a membership letter, a more interactive website, and implemented a reminder and renewal system for membership. In saying that, if you have an idea for a workshop, then let your Board know. We have lots of resources for advertising, handling registration, finding facilities etc. Just bring us your idea and potential speakers and we can help make it happen.

Lastly, many of you took the opportunity to give us Kudos for good work, recognized our commitment, and reiterated the importance to support legislation involvement. Thank you.


The 2014 – 2015 ORTWS Board